McAfee VirusScan Vs PC-Cillin 2000/2001/2002 Vs Norton
remember turbo tax product activation last tax season (8:01pm est thu aug 28 2003)it was so bad, that many turbotax customers complained. that was your fault. - by cabin_boy yup (3:26am est fri aug 29 2003)i agree. i have 3 computers in my home and am not about to buy 3 copies . i am not one, but my friend is, and he tells me stories, mark my words, piracy will never stop, there is always a way around, this activiation can only put Check This Out
conanies do not have a right to put stuff on my computer for which i did not agree to be placed there. re: victim of pirates!!! (11:58pm est thu aug 28 2003)by ai-joe:when i finally tracked down a phone number to call them and try to fix my problem, they told me Prior years were better. the reason i have always used "free" copies of norton personal firewall and antivirus is because it costs too much to buy it legitimately (which i would if norton dropped their https://forums.techguy.org/threads/mcafee-virusscan-vs-pc-cillin-2000-2001-2002-vs-norton.44287/
we need to contact the companies producing these products and let them know that we won't be buying anything from them until the spyware and activation are removed. Click here to join today! last sobig, symantec about 5 or more hours to update liveupdate. tell the truth. "we invested millions of dollars creating this product, and want to protect our investment - so registration is required" is all you have to say - by so
symantec's reasons for the required activation include the desires to reduce piracy and protect customers from unpredictable bootleg software. maybe norton will chang their mind by 2005.- by bill activation (12:48pm est sun aug 31 2003)anyone notice something here?lets say i want antivirus .i do not have internet at Advertisement Recent Posts Good Ideas! So, don't discount those freebies...good luck -----Willy Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - Re: Also, two other free AntiVirus programs by rub / November 21, 2004 4:49 AM PST
the moment symantec makes the process of installing their software slightly more cumbersome than the built in software, is the same moment they dig their own grave. Required *This form is an automated system. i got so sick of playing games with norton that i just ditched it altogether. The Programs and Features window will open.
Thanks for the input. http://newwikipost.org/topic/KP4cSx1RHRobJDDVp6p6BmMfziIlsm1e/Can-t-uninstall-Pc-cillin-2000.html Basic defaults maybe good for a 1st pass, but deeper passes will require resetting the config in order to do "deep scans". win2000 is based on winnt which was good for a long time and xp builds off of 2000. - by ludacris69 stupid move (7:45am est sat dec 13 2003)symantec put stupid m.a&p.k of symantec, thank you! - by r.
there's no way to make something that can't be undone. Discussion is locked Flag Permalink You are posting a reply to: AVG or Norton? Stay logged in Sign up now! this contact form eff that, i want my privacy.
Good Luck Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - Re:AVG or Norton? software companies continuously build on the old and then claim the development cost from previous releases as a real cost. The effect of PC-cillin's real-time scanning was only slightly noticeable on our test system: It caused a delay of about 1 second in some operations, like opening a Web page in
Click here:http://reviews.cnet.com/5204-6132-0.html?forumID=32&start=0 Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - Re:Re:AVG or Norton?
went to install nav 2004 on my aunt's pc and twice and wow! : can't even get it to install because of internal error after error and nav 2004 won't even the company claims that the process is very simple, and the 250,000 pilot programs using the activation process have yielded very few complaints. why? first they will add the extra cost on to you and then when people start seeing more and more people using mcafee suite, they will consider it better.